RE: [ws-caf] discussion on approaches for web services/ business transaction

["Haugen Robert" <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com>]

Eric Newcomer wrote:
> the point of WS-CAF is to define a protocol complementary 
> to the lower level protocols, not a replacement for them.  

I can understand that assertion re WS-Context and WS-CF (Coordination),
but the issue Peter and I and others have raised is about WS-TXM.

When I read WS-TXM, I see a suite of new business transaction protocols:
ACID, LRA and BP, where BP itself decomposes into a suite of
sub-protocols.

How do I correlate the suite of new protocols in WS-TM with your
statement above?