Re: [ws-caf] Minutes Confcall January 19

[Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM>]

All,

My apologies for missing the call yesterday due to the holiday.

Did the group agree to Mark's proposed resolution for issue 7 without 
modification?  That is, are we going with "Respondant"?  Agreement on 
this issue implies the group is not paying attention because 
"respondant" is not in the dictionaries I have checked, even as a 
British spelling.  "Respondent" seems to be the correct word though its 
meaning involves a legal nuance (being a defendant) irrelevant to our usage.

thanx,
	doug

On 20-Jan-04 07:01, Guy Pardon wrote:

> Below are the meetings I recorded. Due to the interference on the line I 
> am not sure if I got everything right.
> Please send your comments to me if you have any.
> 
> Guy
...

> Next item: issues resolution
> Martin: The only way to make progress is by going over issues and 
> resolve them before moving on.
> Did everyone get a chance to read the issues? Silence. Any motions?
> Remark: In most cases they appear typos or editorial fixes.
> 
> Motion to adopt them (issues 1-11) by Greg. Anybody seconding? Yes: Simeon.
> Any discussions? No. Objections? No. Motion approved.
> 
> Simeon still has to do an update.
...