[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 7 revisit
Doug, I'm happy to re-open the issue (which isn't actually closed yet until I get the updates from Simeon). However, I presume it's down to the TC to agree to re-open it. Mark. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Bunting" <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> To: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:32 PM Subject: Re: [ws-caf] Minutes Confcall January 19 > All, > > My apologies for missing the call yesterday due to the holiday. > > Did the group agree to Mark's proposed resolution for issue 7 without > modification? That is, are we going with "Respondant"? Agreement on > this issue implies the group is not paying attention because > "respondant" is not in the dictionaries I have checked, even as a > British spelling. "Respondent" seems to be the correct word though its > meaning involves a legal nuance (being a defendant) irrelevant to our usage. > > thanx, > doug > > On 20-Jan-04 07:01, Guy Pardon wrote: > > > Below are the meetings I recorded. Due to the interference on the line I > > am not sure if I got everything right. > > Please send your comments to me if you have any. > > > > Guy > ... > > > Next item: issues resolution > > Martin: The only way to make progress is by going over issues and > > resolve them before moving on. > > Did everyone get a chance to read the issues? Silence. Any motions? > > Remark: In most cases they appear typos or editorial fixes. > > > > Motion to adopt them (issues 1-11) by Greg. Anybody seconding? Yes: Simeon. > > Any discussions? No. Objections? No. Motion approved. > > > > Simeon still has to do an update. > ... > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]