[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] next set of issues
Mark Little wrote: > Given what was decided yesterday, it seems like issue 16 should be > closed as it is covered by issue 45. > > Mark. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mark Little <mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com> > *To:* ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org > <mailto:ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org> > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:02 PM > *Subject:* [ws-caf] next set of issues > > Concentrating on general and WS-Context issues for now, I want to > propose we try to tidy up the following issues: > > 12 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12> > nor P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com > <mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com> NEW clarify reply-to address in > schema (and possibly the text) > 13 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13> > maj P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com > <mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com> NEW UserActivityServicePortType > the "completionStatus" operat... > 14 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14> > nor P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW StatusType is a > restriction but is extended in WS-TXM. Is... > 15 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15> > cri P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW CompleteWithStatus has > the wrong type > 16 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16> > nor P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW None of the WS-CAF > schemas are WSI BP compliant. > 17 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17> > nor P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW wsc4c is referenced in > parts of WS-CF schema. Is it elsew... > 18 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18> > maj P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW Incorrect WSDL import > statement. > 19 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19> > cri P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW No "part" attribute. > 20 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20> > nor P2 All mark.little@arjuna.com NEW Missing portType > operations > > > In line with something Alastair (I think) mentioned yesterday > about possible sharing implications of context, this came up at > the face-to-face and is > > 46 > <http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46> > nor P2 All ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org NEW Context sharing > > > So maybe we want to discuss it too, though I suspect it won't be > resolved quickly. > > Mark. > Mark, Bug # 45 was regarding which version of the BP to use. 16 on the other hand claims that the files are not compliant. Even though we've agreed to use BP 1.0 (or whichever version is publicly available), I have not completed the work to make the wsdls BP compliant yet so I think we should leave 16 open. Agree? -Simeon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]