FW: [ogsi-wg] RE: [ws-caf] WS-Resource Framework

["Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>]

Another message...

--
Savas Parastatidis
http://savas.parastatidis.name (now blogging)
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Berry [mailto:daveb@nesc.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 11:11 AM
> To: Jeffrey Frey; Mark Little
> Cc: Newcomer, Eric; Ian Foster; ogsi-wg@gridforum.org; owner-ogsi-
> wg@gridforum.org; Savas Parastatidis; ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ogsi-wg] RE: [ws-caf] WS-Resource Framework
> 
> I did find this terminology confusing during the detailed presentation
> of WS-RF at GlobusWorld.  The presentation used the word "context" to
> express the resolution of an EPR at a particular web service, which
> seemed to me to invite confusion with any wider context involving that
> message.  So if you can find an alternative terminology, I do think it
> would help to reduce confusion.
> 
> At least you could distinguish between "message context" or "global
> context" on the one hand, and "service context" or "target context" on
> the other.
> 
> A caveat: I'm a complete novice in web service terminology.
> 
> Dave.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Frey [mailto:jafrey@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: 27 January 2004 06:01
> To: Mark Little
> Cc: Newcomer, Eric; Ian Foster; ogsi-wg@gridforum.org;
> owner-ogsi-wg@gridforum.org; Savas Parastatidis;
> ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ogsi-wg] RE: [ws-caf] WS-Resource Framework
> 
> If it would help eliminate the
> confusion, I would be happy to stop using the word "context" to
express
> the
> intended semantic of the references properties within a WS-Addressing
> EPR.
>