RE: [ws-caf] [Bug 52] New: Are the failure properties general enough?

["Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>]

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Is this arising from Greg's comment
in his session state example that FAIL_ONLY, FAIL don't have obvious
meaning in that case ?  And thus, if the answer to this issue is "no",
that the whole of CompletionStatus should be dropped from WS-Context as
such ?

Peter


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com [mailto:bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com] 
> Sent: 29 January 2004 13:16
> To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-caf] [Bug 52] New: Are the failure properties 
> general enough?
> 
> 
> http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52
> 
>            Summary: Are the failure properties general enough?
>            Product: WS-Context
>            Version: 1.0
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: Model
>         AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
>         ReportedBy: mark.little@arjuna.com
>          QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com
> 
> 
> Are the failure properties sufficiently general a property of 
> session-oriented 
> activities to merit definition in the lowest levels of the stack?
> 
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>