Peter, sorry for the delay as I was on vacation.
The issue of failure properties of an activity came up, as Mark points
out, on several occasions, both during the face to face and while we
were discussing the use cases for context. It was my sense that there
was an unresolved question in several people's minds as to whether they
might be sufficiently "generic" to apply to all activities modeled by a
context or a subset only. I think it would be worth hashing this out
and making sure that we have a consensus. At this point, I've avoided
suggesting a resolution, with the assumption that one will fall out of
our discusssions.
Thanks.
Greg
-------- Original Message --------
Greg's up a mountain at the moment, but I'm sure he'll get back to you when
he's able.
However, in the interim, I *think* that you are right as to what the issue
is meant to convey. This came up at the face-to-face in Boston and then
later in Greg's example.
This is obviously a discussion point that we should have, but as to what the
final decision is and the impact on the specification, that's obviously not
clear at this point.
Mark.
----
Mark Little,
Chief Architect, Transactions,
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
www.arjuna.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
To: <bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com>; <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] [Bug 52] New: Are the failure properties general
enough?
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Is this arising from Greg's comment
> in his session state example that FAIL_ONLY, FAIL don't have obvious
> meaning in that case ? And thus, if the answer to this issue is "no",
> that the whole of CompletionStatus should be dropped from WS-Context as
> such ?
>
> Peter
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com [mailto:bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com]
> > Sent: 29 January 2004 13:16
> > To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-caf] [Bug 52] New: Are the failure properties
> > general enough?
> >
> >
> > http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52
> >
> > Summary: Are the failure properties general enough?
> > Product: WS-Context
> > Version: 1.0
> > Platform: All
> > OS/Version: All
> > Status: NEW
> > Severity: normal
> > Priority: P2
> > Component: Model
> > AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> > ReportedBy: mark.little@arjuna.com
> > QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com
> >
> >
> > Are the failure properties sufficiently general a property of
> > session-oriented
> > activities to merit definition in the lowest levels of the stack?
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> >
>
|