Fwd: RE: [ws-caf] Statement for WS-Transactions workshop

[James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>]

>Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:25:38 -0800 (PST)
>From: Eric Newcomer
>Subject: Fwd: failure notice
>
>Please forward this to the WS-CAF list.  It's timely,
>and was due today.  Our email server has been down all
>afternoon and evening.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Eric
>
>
>--- MAILER-DAEMON@mail.oasis-open.org wrote:
> > From MAILER-DAEMON@mail.oasis-open.org Mon Mar  8
> > 19:10:20 2004
> > Date: 9 Mar 2004 03:10:20 -0000
> > From: MAILER-DAEMON@mail.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: failure notice
> >
> > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at
> > mail.oasis-open.org.
> > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to
> > the following addresses.
> > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it
> > didn't work out.
> >
> > <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>:
> > Sorry, only contributing members may post. If you
> > are a contributing member, please forward this
> > message to administration@lists.oasis-open.org
> > (#5.7.2)
> >
> > --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> >
> > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:24:08 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Eric Newcomer
> > Subject: RE: [ws-caf] Statement for WS-Transactions
> > workshop
> > To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> >
> > Apologies - I typed this in much earlier today, but
> > our email system has been out since noon, and is
> > apparently still down.  So I'm posting from my
> > private account.  Eric
> > ------
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Per today's concall, here is the edited version of the
> > statement I plan to give on behalf of the WS-CAF TC at
> > the Microsoft/IBM/BEA WS-Transactions feedback
> > workshop Wednesday March 10.  Please let me know if
> > there are any further comments or suggestions.
> >
> > The WS-CAF TC would like to recognize the common
> > ancestry and technical similarities across the WS-T,
> > WS-C, WS-BA and WS-CAF sets of specifications.  During
> > our work we've discovered the benefits of separating
> > out context management as a generic mechanism, and
> > have developed a key additional protocol called the
> > Business Process transaction model.  We think the
> > WS-T, WS-C, and WS-BA specifications would benefit
> > from including these major concepts.
> >
> > We propose a discussion on finding the best way to
> > move forward and bring our work together.
> >
> > Thanks -
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: Newcomer, Eric
> > Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:26 AM
> > To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-caf] Statement for WS-Transactions
> > workshop
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's what I'd propose for a statement from WS-CAF to
> > the Microsoft/IBM/BEA Workshop this Wednesday.  For
> > discussion tomorrow.
> >
> > The WS-CAF TC believes that the best path forward for
> > the industry would be cooperation on merging the
> > WS-CAF set of specifications with the WS-T, WS-C, and
> > WS-BA set of specifications.  Toward that end we would
> > like to propose that Microsoft, IBM, and BEA adopt the
> > concept of separating out the context mechanism into
> > its own specification (i.e. agreeing to work jointly
> > to progress WS-Context) and to investigate the
> > alignment of WS-Coordination Framework with
> > WS-Coordination, and agreement to jointly progress the
> > Business Process transaction model defined in the
> > WS-Transaction Management specification.
> >
> > Also, WS-CAF would like to re-iterate its invitation
> > to Microsoft, IBM, and BEA to join the WS-TC, and
> > submit WS-T, WS-C, and WS-BA to the WS-CAF TC for
> > consolidation and aligmnent.
> >
> >
> > Eric Newcomer
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > eric.newcomer@iona.com
> >
>-------------------------------------------------------
> > IONA Technologies
> > 200 West Street Waltham, MA 02451 USA
> > Tel: (781) 902-8366
> > Fax: (781) 902-8009
> >
>-------------------------------------------------------
> > Making Software Work Together TM