OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-caf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-caf] On the synchronous request/response model


However, the facility offered by request/response has never been ruled out. 
I'm against removing it and making it out-of-scope, but whether there is a 
normative binding for 1.0 is a different matter.

But this does show we should register the issue.

Mark.

>===== Original Message From "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk> =====
>Ricardo:
>
>> The specification document states as above that both
>> synchronous request/response and asynchronous one-way
>> messages are possible. However, the WSDL currently only
>> provides the interfaces for the asynchronous model.
>> Will we add the WSDL corresponding to the synchronous
>> request/response model?
>
>I would prefer that the text pertaining to synchronous interactions is
>removed from the spec rather than adding in synchronous operations in
>WSDL. The asynchronous aspect was a deliberate design decision to
>improve failure situations (i.e. a service can fail and recover without
>necessarily impacting any other services).
>
>Jim
>--
>http://jim.webber.name




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]