[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] On the synchronous request/response model
However, the facility offered by request/response has never been ruled out. I'm against removing it and making it out-of-scope, but whether there is a normative binding for 1.0 is a different matter. But this does show we should register the issue. Mark. >===== Original Message From "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk> ===== >Ricardo: > >> The specification document states as above that both >> synchronous request/response and asynchronous one-way >> messages are possible. However, the WSDL currently only >> provides the interfaces for the asynchronous model. >> Will we add the WSDL corresponding to the synchronous >> request/response model? > >I would prefer that the text pertaining to synchronous interactions is >removed from the spec rather than adding in synchronous operations in >WSDL. The asynchronous aspect was a deliberate design decision to >improve failure situations (i.e. a service can fail and recover without >necessarily impacting any other services). > >Jim >-- >http://jim.webber.name
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]