[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 52] Are the failure properties general enough?
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52 mark.little@arjuna.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From mark.little@arjuna.com 2004-05-10 10:53 ------- define the completion type for context spec. but remove all values from the specification. State that the referencing specifications can define their own values for this type. Remove completeWithStatus and make complete take an optional completion status value (min=0, max=1). Each ALS is allowed to interpret the receipt of a complete message with no parameter in whichever way it requires. The referencing specs. can define the default value. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]