[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] interesting document
It would also be interesting to consider, in the light of Jim and Guy's exchanges, what role activity completion plays, if any? Activity completion can only be communicated to context recipients if they are registered with the context service that knows that the activity is now complete. WS-Context does not define such a registration-notification mechanism. This continues to leave in question the independent value of WS-Context context-by-value. This type of functionality must reside in the surrounding protocol (session, coordination etc) that in my example is denoted by the namespace URI indicated by the prefix "protocol" (the "referencing specification"). An example of such a protocol is WS-CF, or in truncated form, WS-Coordination.
As there is no bundle of contexts specified by WS-Context (if my understanding has kept pace with the spec changes), the argument that value is provided by easing interception (simpler to identify the group of contexts that must be processed by a set of interceptors), becomes a non-argument.
Where does this leave the independent value of WS-Context context-by-value?
These points are orthogonal to the issue: header element in the raw, body element in the raw, or element embedded in an address.
Alastair
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
Sent: 26 May 2004 16:45
To: ws-caf
Subject: [ws-caf] interesting document
http://forge.gridforum.org/projects/dais-wg/document/draft-ggf-dais-mappings-ggf11/en/1
And Savas is a member of this TC (though I don't think he's ever attended any of the teleconferences ;-)
Mark.
----
Mark Little,
Chief Architect, Transactions,
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
www.arjuna.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]