RE: [ws-caf] Mt Everest and WS-CF

["Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>]

Jim,

> The point is, I want it to be understood and a standard helps 
> that. Not at the SOAP level where the mechanics of 
> mustUnderstand help, but by the _people_ building the 
> service. I can get them to support a standard (hey, they can 
> reuse the work with their other partners) but I can't get 
> them to use my own ad-hoc structure.

But you can get them to understand your own ad-hoc overload of the
ws-context identifier ?

Do you accept that they will have to implement something you define ?
You seem to think WS-Context alone will do it, but it has no semantics.

Peter