Re: [ws-caf] Mt Everest and WS-CF

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

> But you can get them to understand your own ad-hoc overload of the
> ws-context identifier ?
>
> Do you accept that they will have to implement something you define ?
> You seem to think WS-Context alone will do it, but it has no semantics.

Peter, that is incorrect. Maybe there is a problem with the text describing
this, but I thought we were quite clear in the 0.2 draft that a context
identifier represents an activity which represents a set of related
invocations on (potentially a number of different) Web services. As such, by
itself it does have implied semantics: correlation of invocations. This is
precisely what Jim, Savas and the WS-GAF document defined last September (I
think). As such, WS-Context is useful by itself.

Mark.