Re: [ws-caf] Questions about section 3

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

Jim, of course it's possible for someone to provide these tables. Whether
the editors have time or someone else might like to volunteer ... ;-)

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
To: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:34 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] Questions about section 3


> Mark:
>
> > As to what happens if you get an unsolicited message (e.g., a
> > contentsSet when no setContents was sent), then that's pretty
> > much the same: it can happen now, with A. N. Other
> > specification. I suppose we could put something in saying
> > that such unsolicited responses are to be ignored, but is
> > there a standard disclaimer that others use?
>
> This raises an interesting point. Would it be possible for the editors
> to provide (psuedo) state machines that normatively cover this type of
> scenario? They exist in WS-AT/BA and as I recall Peter did some tables
> for the BTP effort along these lines.
>
> Jim
> --
> http://jim.webber.name
>