[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] proposal towards a resolution for issue 132
there is one alternative: to allow type information to be "specified" be derivation. However, I would argue that this should be mandatory (in fact, I believe it's the only element that should be manadatory.) Mark Little wrote: >http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=132 > >There was some discussion on this topic in the mailing list and I agree with Peter (!) The context id is not in and of itself sufficient information to determine the meaning of a context. > >Mark. > >---- >Mark Little, >Chief Architect, Transactions, >Arjuna Technologies Ltd. > >www.arjuna.com > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]