OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-caf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: where issues should be discussed


Title: Message
I've just taken one of my occasional strolls through the ws-caf-editors list archive (http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-caf-editors/)
and discovered that there has been some semi-private discussion there on some of the open issues. This doesn't seem to be right - once an issue has been agreed , it belongs to the editors, as does discussion about who is applying which edits, but discussion on open issues should be on the main list where everyone sees it when its fresh and can respond..
 
Of course, one can't prevent private conversations among groups but this spec belongs to the TC, not the editors.
 
If it is felt that the issues discussion is too detailed for the main list, the TC could set up a sublist (as we did for BTP, where bt-spec did detail stuff, while the main list discussed major things, like what the conf call numbers were).
 
Peter
 
------------------------------------------
Peter Furniss
Chief Scientist, Choreology Ltd
web: http://www.choreology.com
email: peter.furniss@choreology.com
phone: +44 870 739 0066
mobile: +44 7951 536168
 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]