ws-caf message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: where issues should be discussed
- From: "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
- To: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:15:05 +0100
Title: Message
and discovered that
there has been some semi-private discussion there on some of the open issues.
This doesn't seem to be right - once an issue has been agreed , it belongs to
the editors, as does discussion about who is applying which edits, but
discussion on open issues should be on the main list where everyone sees it when
its fresh and can respond..
Of course, one can't
prevent private conversations among groups but this spec belongs to the TC, not
the editors.
If it is felt that
the issues discussion is too detailed for the main list, the TC could set up a
sublist (as we did for BTP, where bt-spec did detail stuff, while the main list
discussed major things, like what the conf call numbers
were).
Peter
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]