RE: [ws-caf] RE: close issue 134?

["Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>]

Title: Message

Mark,

 

Just to be clear, there are (or were) two mustUnderstand attributes referred to in 0.3-and-earlier  - one defined in SOAP, which the WS-CTX spec said had to be ="true", and one defined in ws-context schema as an attribute of participating-services-list, alongside the mustPropagate attribute.

 

129 concerned only the SOAP one.

134 concerned mostly the ws-context:mustUnderstand, and a passing mention of mustPropagate. The latter was removed by 131.

 

I am pleased at this resolution.

 

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
Sent: 06 July 2004 13:45
To: Furniss, Peter; ws-caf
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] RE: close issue 134?

Yes, 129 removes mustUnderstand entirely and 134 does likewise with mustPropagate.

 

I'll mark the issue as closed and refer to those other issues.

 

Thanks,

 

Mark.

----- Original Message -----

From: Furniss, Peter

To: Mark Little ; ws-caf

Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:40 PM

Subject: [ws-caf] RE: close issue 134?

Yes, if I understand the intent correctly

 

129 concerned the SOAP:mustUnderstand attribute in ws-context:context elements in SOAP Headers. The resolution of 129, as I understand it, will be to remove any specific statement about the SOAP:mustUnderstand (it may note that the attribute is available and can have either value, as is normally the case for SOAP Header elements.

 

134 concerned the wsctx:mustUnderstand attribute which was (incorrectly) defined as an attribute of participating-services-list. I assume the intent is to remove it completely. If that is the intent, I concur.

 

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
Sent: 06 July 2004 12:24
To: Furniss, Peter; ws-caf
Subject: close issue 134?

Peter, I believe that this issue (http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=134) is no longer required because of the resolution to issues 129 and 131. Since you raised it I wanted to check before doing anything (or proposing to do anything).

 

Mark.