Re: [ws-caf] clarification of issue 133

[Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>]

Just a clarification: the agreement was that either the service 
reference element or a dereferenceable url would be sent. If the former, 
it's content is unspecified, though it could be a ws-addressing endpoint 
reference, a ws-md wsref or some other mechanism; in any case, the spec 
doesn't allow for an endpoint reference to be used as an alternative to 
a url.

Mark Little wrote:

>Peter, in order to address issue 133 (http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=133) I'd like to get some clarification. It appears that you are suggesting that we have different context structures for pass-by-reference and pass-by-value? Is that correct?
>
>If it is, then I think this issue should be closed because we already discussed this at the New Orleans face-to-face in and around the general subject of addressing. The result was that the URI that was there has been changed to be an EPR, but the structure was to remain the same for both formats.
>
>Following on from the above assumption, we could look at the current text and make sure it's clear that only the EPR should be sent if by reference.
>
>Mark.
>
>----
>Mark Little,
>Chief Architect, Transactions,
>Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
> 
>www.arjuna.com
>
>
>  
>