RE: [ws-caf] propsed text for issue 133

["Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>]

It's probably true though that this wording was included at the time when we were thinking about including a REST-ish feature (which has since been completely removed from the spec).

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 9:16 AM
To: Jim Webber; ws-caf
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] propsed text for issue 133


The getContents/contents message exchange pattern is defined (plus the
WSDL). It was there in the doc. that you were editor on ;-)

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
To: "ws-caf" <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] propsed text for issue 133


> Hey Mark,
>
> Thanks for your (continued) patience.
>
> > So, the context
> > manager is a fully fledged Web service and interaction with
> > it is uniform with the other services we define.
>
> I'm probably being dim, but I don't understand this. Does this mean
> there is a message exchange defined or some other access mechanism?
>
> Jim
> --
> http://jim.webber.name
>