|
Right
- we already have solved this issue technically for the WS-CAF specs, but it
still might be worth a few minutes' discussion, either on the next call or
during a subsequent meeting, about what, if anything, we might want to recommend
to the W3C WG that will be chartered to produce a new, unified spec.
WS-CAF is listed in the charter proposal as one of the related specs at OASIS
that uses addressing, so I'd suggest as a TC we spend a few minutes sometime in
the near future coming up with some input for the W3C WG.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:52
PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] WS-Addressing to
W3C
I believe that the outcome that is being requested is the chartering of
a working group to provide an 'a'ddressing solution, which I presume will
not be a rubber stamp of existing product specs (though one can never be
certain).
Yes, that was the last discussion I was
involved with and there was/is a proposed charter. It would seem that the
proposed charter accompanying the WS-Addressing submission is different though
and does sound more like a rubber stamping exercise. I'll have to read it in
more detail to be sure though.
This suggests that there may be merit in maintaining a holder mechanism
to cope with the forward evolution of specifications in this space for the
time being.
I think everyone is looking forward to a standard in
this space. The one caveat is that it may still be in a time frame that
exceeds those we have in place for WS-CAF. This is something we should plan
to discuss; how about we put it as an agenda item for the next call?
I don't think there's any harm in
discussing it, but I agree: the timeframes may slip and we shouldn't delay.
There is nothing wrong with the open content model approach to addressing
we've already adopted.
Mark.
Greg
Mark Little
wrote:
Jeff's on holiday at the moment, but I'm sure the intent is that we try to
merge the two sets of requirements into one agreed standard.
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
To: "Newcomer Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
Cc: "WS-CAF" <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] WS-Addressing to W3C
Absolutely. Now the next question is: What will happen with
WS-MessageDelivery?
Joe
"Newcomer, Eric" wrote:
Joe - Yes, this is tremendous news. Also the submission says the
authors agree to contribute all their copyright IP to W3C, and to abide by
the W3C IP policy for royalty-free implementations!
This should settle our concerns about referncing WS-Addressing in
WS-CAF, in my view.
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:40 PM
To: WS-CAF
Subject: [ws-caf] WS-Addressing to W3C
I realize that some probably already know this, but the WS-Addressing
specification was (finally) submitted to W3C[1].
Also, the authors include not only Microsoft, IBM, BEA, and SAP, but
...Sun Microsystems.
Joe
[1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/ws-addressing/
--
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
--
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
|