It
was closed earlier this month. I believe the following text was
added:
"One
or more other specifications, such as (but not limited to) WS-CF may reference
the WS-Context specification. The usage of the optional items in WS-Context is
typically determined by the requirements of such as referencing
specification."
but
there was discussion (on the editor's mailing list and telecons) where it was
thought that the specification already made clear that conformance issues there
are. Your text goes a little further than we (the editors) thought necessary: a
conformant implementation MUST support all mandatory items and MAY support any
optional items.
However,
a cursory glance at your text looks like a useful
addition.
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:37
PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] WS-Context
potential bug - no explicit conformance statements
Dear
Mark,
Sorry, I forgot to check the bug list! - but the
answer is definitely yes!
having now read bug 139 it appears to support my
rationale for fixing, but to have been closed with out giving a rationale for
closing without making any change to the specification (in the bugzilla text
anyway as far as I can currently spot - I am sure that a rational has been
given in some meeting or other). Can you point me to the rationale for
closing without fixing the specification?
Best
Regards,
Tony
|
Tony
Fletcher
Technical
Advisor
Choreology
Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J
UK |
Phone:
|
+44
(0) 1473 729537 |
Mobile:
|
+44
(0) 7801 948219 |
Fax:
|
+44
(0) 870 7390077 |
Web: |
www.choreology.com |
Cohesions™ |
Business
transaction management software for application
coordination |
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
|
Home:
amfletcher@iee.org |
Mark.
---- Mark Little, Chief Architect,
Transactions, Arjuna Technologies Ltd. www.arjuna.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:18
PM
Subject: [ws-caf] WS-Context potential
bug - no explicit conformance statements
Dear
Colleagues,
In response
(well partially, I was thinking of sending this in anyway!) to Martin's plea
for us to look through the WS-Context specification for 'editorials' I would
like to submit the attached on Conformance. I guess this will be
classed as a fairly major editorial. I am sorry to have only got
around recently to waking up to this aspect and doing something about it,
but I have tried to provide fairly complete text for others to comment on
and knock into shape. My aim is to help produce a complete and rounded
specification and I regard being clear on conformance as an important part
of this.
Best
Regards,
Tony
|
Tony
Fletcher
Technical
Advisor
Choreology
Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J
UK |
Phone:
|
+44
(0) 1473 729537 |
Mobile:
|
+44
(0) 7801 948219 |
Fax:
|
+44
(0) 870 7390077 |
Web: |
www.choreology.com |
Cohesions™ |
Business
transaction management software for application
coordination |
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
|
Home:
amfletcher@iee.org |
|