[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 166] New: Implementation of what ?
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=166 Summary: Implementation of what ? Product: WS-CF Version: 1.0 Platform: PC URL: http://www.choreology.com/external/ws- cf.choreology_comments.htm#CHCF-8 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Text and diagrams AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org ReportedBy: tony.fletcher@choreology.com QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com Where: Page 12, para 3. last sentence Which “implementations” do not need to support mid-activity coordination ? Does this really mean the coordination protocol (in which case “supported” should be “required”). If it means a software incarnation of one of the services, such a service would presumably not support a coordination protocol that did use mid-activity coordination. Suggestion: Clarify ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]