[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 175] New: Implementation and service
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=175 Summary: Implementation and service Product: WS-CF Version: 1.0 Platform: PC URL: http://www.choreology.com/external/ws- cf.choreology_comments.htm#CHCF-17 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Text and diagrams AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org ReportedBy: tony.fletcher@choreology.com QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com Where: Page 19, para 2, para 4 These paragraphs use “implementation” and “coordination service” in a different sense to elsewhere. Para 4 seems to switch to referring to a coordinator instance. Suggestion: Ensure consistent use of terms throughout the document. (Note (and fix) the dual use of “implementation” in the first sentence of para 4) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]