[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 193] New: Mysteries in example context
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=193 Summary: Mysteries in example context Product: WS-CF Version: 1.0 Platform: PC URL: http://www.choreology.com/external/ws- cf.choreology_comments.htm#CHCF-35 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Text and diagrams AssignedTo: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org ReportedBy: tony.fletcher@choreology.com QAContact: mark.little@arjuna.com Where: Page 27/28, xml example A lot of stuff seems to have happened to this context that doesn’t have any defined means to make it happen. Where did the child context come from ? What does it mean ? What populated the activity-lists ? Is it significant (i.e. is there anything to show) that this is for a two-phase completion protocol ? (i.e. what changes would be needed if it were three-phase. Suggestion: It would be more useful if the example used different bases of the uri’s that represent parts of ws-caf, other example specification, and particular instances of services, and more imaginative names for the last fields (hotel, taxi etc). This would make it easier to guess what the uri's were for. (Of course, it shouldn't be necessary to guess, because ws-context and ws-cf should specify clearly what they mean) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]