RE: [ws-caf] Editorial updates to the current WS-CF specification

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

If you label unofficial versions as editors draft then there will not be
any confusion.
The working draft label can be used for TC approved versions.
In any case please change committee draft to editors draft!

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] 
>Sent: 22 December 2004 19:34
>To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [ws-caf] Editorial updates to the current WS-CF specification
>
>
>Please find attached the current WS-CF specification. It is not 
>finished in terms of editorial updates, which is why I thought 
>I'd send 
>it to the list rather than upload it to the TC page as an official 
>version (if anyone disagrees, let me know).
>
>Within, you'll find comments which are editorial and comments 
>which are 
>potential new issues. Take a look at your convenience (Tony, 
>try not to 
>do this on Christmas day!)
>
>I'll enter the issues we've identified so far into bugzilla. 
>Please let 
>us know of any others that you come across. With any luck we'll have a 
>new revision of the specification early in the new year.
>
>Peter (Furniss), could you look through this version of the 
>specification with an eye to revisiting your currently registered 
>issues for WS-CF? It may well be that some of them are no 
>longer issues 
>and if that's the case let me know and I'll close them down.
>
>Have a happy Christmas!
>
>Mark.
>
>----
>Mark Little,
>Chief Architect,
>Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
>
>www.arjuna.com
>