Re: [ws-caf] AssertionType

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

Tony, if you really want to know what it was for I'm sure I can dig it out
of the archives. However, I think the URI is not required any longer. If it
is for a specific implementation or a referencing specification, then it can
always be added as part of the Any in the basic AssertionType.

All the best,

Mark.

----
Mark Little,
Chief Architect,
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.

www.arjuna.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
To: "'WS-CAF'" <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:07 PM
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] AssertionType


> Dear John and others,
>
> As I said on the phone, as far as I can see at present,
> AssertionWithProtocolURIType only adds a protocol-uri element which is of
> anyURI type.  Again the purpose and use of this parameter is not described
> in the WS-Context specification, so the first obvious thought is to drop
it
> too.  If this parameter is really required it can be added to each
protocol
> message (which would now not be an extension of anything) as easily as
each
> protocol message extending this base type.  In this case the purpose and
use
> of this parameter should be clearly described in the WS-Context
> specification.
>
>
>  Best Regards     Tony
> A M Fletcher
>
> Cohesions  (TM)
>
> Business transaction management software for application coordination
> www.choreology.com
>
> Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ     UK
> Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537   Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219
> tony.fletcher@choreology.com     (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fuller [mailto:jfuller@wernervas.com]
> Sent: 17 January 2005 21:12
> To: WS-CAF
> Subject: [ws-caf] AssertionType
>
>
>
> If we get rid of AssertionType, what happens to
> AssertionWithProtocolURIType?
>
>