RE: [ws-caf] Question on the order of sections in WS-Context

["Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>]

Title: Message

Tony,

 

Is this an editorial issue?  I mean is it a proposal to improve the flow of the document?

 

Thanks,

 

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Fletcher [mailto:tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 8:14 AM
To: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-caf] Question on the order of sections in WS-Context

Dear Colleagues,

 

I would like to poll the TC for a response before lodging this issue as a 'bug' on Bugzilla.

 

Is there a good reason why the optional Context Manager service is described before the Context Service in WS-Context?

 

This is not a really strongly held view, but it does seem to me that it would be better to describe the architecture and then the context structure first (which we do), then the mandatory Context service for generating and 'lifecycling' contexts and then the optional Context manager service for dereferencing contexts that are passed by reference.  In other words I am suggesting swapping sections 4 and 5 around.

 

Best Regards,

Tony                          

	Tony Fletcher Technical Advisor Choreology Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J   UK
	Phone:	+44 (0) 1473 729537
	Mobile:	+44 (0) 7801 948219
	Fax:	+44 (0) 870 7390077
	Web:	www.choreology.com
Cohesions™
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
Home: amfletcher@iee.org