[Bug 124] Shall we include in the WSDL a binding for synchronous interaction style?

[bugzilla-daemon@arjuna.com]

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=124





------- Additional Comments From mark.little@arjuna.com  2005-02-17 11:13 -------
Martin : leave as is for the moment and wait for WSDL 2.  WSDL 1.1 has portTypes
and ports and in and out messages.  Current 1.1 defined bindings (though these
are not normative ) say in and out are on the same connection for HTTP and
silent on the topic for other bindings.  This is not reliable if there is a long
time between the request and response.  Do not want to invent addressing
mechanisms to achieve good reliable performance.  Mark motioned and Kevin
seconded to close this issue with no action.
It was noted that one can add one's own WSDL to any of the CAF specifications.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.