OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-caf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-caf] proposal for issue 243


Does anyone have any comments on this? I'd like to start a vote on this 
in the next few days, so please let me know by Friday.

Mark.


Mark Little wrote:

> Actually as Kevin just pointed out to me, this won't work unless the 
> receiver knows when the duration started. So, I suggest we go for 
> dateTime and require it to be UTC. Obviously there'll need to be some 
> text about the fact we don't require clock synchronization protocols 
> to be run, so this should not be used for fine-grained time decisions.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>
>> http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=243
>>
>> With reference to http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#isoformats
>>
>> I don't really have a preference either way (dateTime or duration), 
>> but since the context timeout is meant to be the duration for the 
>> context, it seems to make more sense to set this to be the duration 
>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#duration).
>>
>> Mark.
>>
begin:vcard
fn:Mark Little
n:Little;Mark
email;internet:mark.little@arjuna.com
title:Chief Architect
version:2.1
end:vcard



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]