[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-caf] proposal for issue 247
Not sure if people saw the notice of the ballot for this issue, but it closes this Saturday http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-caf/ballot.php?id=727 >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] >Sent: 26 March 2005 09:12 >To: ws-caf >Subject: Re: [ws-caf] proposal for issue 247 > > >The original format of status values came from Fujitsu. However, after >some discussion with Kevin, it seems that maybe QName would be >a better >approach; I think it satisfies all requirements. Anyway, to keep the >momentum going, that's the way I'm going to phrase the current vote. > >Mark. > > >Mark Little wrote: > >> Any comments before I register this as a vote (Friday)? >> >> Mark. >> >> >> Mark Little wrote: >> >>> http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=247 >>> >>> Proposal: make the namespace attribute mandatory. >>> Reason: avoid conflicts in referencing specifications. (I think the >>> original intention was that it should be mandatory anyway, so this >>> may be a typo.) >>> >>> Mark. >>> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]