[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: WS-Context issues for the New Orleans f2f
Ignoring all schema/WSDL issues, which will need to be examined when we get the schema/WSDL, here is the list of issues that we should try to address at the face-to-face. I've attached a small summary about where I think we stand in regard to each issue: http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=234 - let's have a discussion; but to be honest, I'm happy to either remove it entirely, or close without action (even though it's my issue). http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=235 - I haven't seen any corrected text. http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=236 - has not been discussed at all as far as I know (maybe at the last teleconference - no minutes to confirm). http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=238 - this is really just part of the general "what is our fault model" discussion. http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=241 - Greg produced some text around this, but I'm not sure where we stand on a specific resolution. http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=244 - related to 241. http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=246 - as above. http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=249 - related to 238. http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=251 - to be done once we have the WSDL. Mark. -- Mark Little Chief Architect Arjuna Technologies Ltd (www.arjuna.com)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]