WS-Context issues for the New Orleans f2f

[Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

Ignoring all schema/WSDL issues, which will need to be examined when we 
get the schema/WSDL, here is the list of issues that we should try to 
address at the face-to-face. I've attached a small summary about where I 
think we stand in regard to each issue:

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=234 - let's have 
a discussion; but to be honest, I'm happy to either remove it entirely, 
or close without action (even though it's my issue).

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=235 - I haven't 
seen any corrected text.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=236 - has not 
been discussed at all as far as I know (maybe at the last teleconference 
- no minutes to confirm).

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=238 - this is 
really just part of the general "what is our fault model" discussion.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=241 - Greg 
produced some text around this, but I'm not sure where we stand on a 
specific resolution.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=244 - related to 
241.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=246 - as above.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=249 - related to 
238.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=251 - to be done 
once we have the WSDL.

Mark.

-- 
Mark Little
Chief Architect
Arjuna Technologies Ltd
(www.arjuna.com)