WS-CF issues for New Orleans f2f

[Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

As with the last email, here's where I think we stand with the current 
WS-CF issues:

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=165 - no sign of 
the four-body diagram; I'll make a motion of close this issue without 
further action in New Orleans.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=187 - I think 
Tony did a nice job with the WS-Context table and something similar 
should be produced for CF. Currently assigned to Tony.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=191 - no longer 
relevant and I'll make a motion to close in New Orleans.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=192 - we can 
discuss this at New Orleans because we will have updated schema/WSDL.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201 - the 
editors have not added this section. Is it still required?

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=208 - the TC 
needs to discuss this and determine precisely what is required for 
conformance.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=211 - this is 
related to the fact we don't have a fault model.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=215 - still 
outstanding. Wasn't someone from the Dublin f2f going to send round the 
architecture diagrams we drew then?

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=216 - isn't this 
related to 187.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=217 - not done 
and definitely needs a concerted effort in New Orleans to determine what 
the sequencing is. Then we can produce a table.

http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=233 - not done.

Mark.

-- 
Mark Little
Chief Architect
Arjuna Technologies Ltd
(www.arjuna.com)