[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 249] fault queries (Anish 49)
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=249 ------- Additional Comments From mark.little@arjuna.com 2005-05-03 09:46 ------- Fault Model (issue 249): Vigorous discussion ensued. Consensus that BaseFaults would be better than current proposal, but the group wants to align with the SOAP and WS-Addressing models if possible. Greg Pavlik makes motion: remove all Fault operations and messages. Each fault is rewritten according to this template: 1) Name of fault. This should be a Qname. 2) Text explanation of fault 3) Reason field: string 4) Detail field: schema backed XML 3) Mapping to SOAP faults. For SOAP 1.1, QName maps to fault code, reason maps to fault string; detail is elided. for SOAP 1.2 QName maps to subcode. reason maps to reason detail maps to detail. Simeon Greene seconds. Editors should update spec to make this model clear. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]