RE: [ws-caf] Groups - JavaOne 2005 f2f minutes.txt uploaded

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Green, Alastair J. [mailto:Alastair.Green@choreology.com] 
>Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:21 PM
>To: mark.little@arjuna.com; ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [ws-caf] Groups - JavaOne 2005 f2f minutes.txt uploaded
>
>
>Two questions
>
>Do I take it that the defeat of my untabled motion leaves the 
>status quo ante bellum in place (i.e the result of the whole 
>discussion was "no change")? 

Yes; from the minutes:

One issue, generic identification of context headers
Alastair's motion is already tabled. now brought off the table for
dicsusion - note chairs timed this discussion to the published agenda
time.

Kevin: Current motion doesn't address my reason for raising the issue
Discussion about relationship with mustUnderstand, roles and processing.

Greg: call to vote.
Vote on motion
For: 0, Against: 6, abstain: 0
Motion is defeated.