RE: [ws-caf] [Fwd: Groups - oasis - New ballot "Approve WS-Context V1 as a Committee Draft"]

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

Correct. A vote for *Committee Spec* must be done by Jamie after the
public review.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:46 PM
>To: Martin Chapman
>Cc: 'Doug Bunting'; ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: Re: [ws-caf] [Fwd: Groups - oasis - New ballot 
>"Approve WS-Context V1 as a Committee Draft"]
>
>
>The minutes are correct. I think the confusion arises because the vote 
>to adopt WS-Context needs to be conducted by Jamie I believe, *after* 
>the 15 day review period. Correct?
>
>Mark.
>
>
>Martin Chapman wrote:
>
>>I am really confused! The minutes from the 24th show context arleady 
>>being voted as CD and to be put out for public review so what is the 
>>point of this ballot, and why does it end nov 30th?
>>Also the same minutes recored ws-cf being voted as cd and 
>being put out
>>for public review.
>>
>>Can someone please clarify.
>>
>>Martin.
>>  
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:17 AM
>>>To: Doug Bunting
>>>Cc: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
>>>Subject: Re: [ws-caf] [Fwd: Groups - oasis - New ballot 
>>>"Approve WS-Context V1 as a Committee Draft"]
>>>
>>>
>>>You're right. The should refer to the latest version of 
>WS-Context and
>>>not WS-CF.
>>>
>>>There should be a separate announcement for WS-CF to go to
>>>public review.
>>>
>>>Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>Doug Bunting wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>>The referenced document (WS-CF) and the ballot (WS-Context) seem to 
>>>>conflict.  I am struggling to remember what we are actually
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>voting on.
>>>    
>>>
>>>>thanx,
>>>>   doug
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Mark Little
>>>Chief Architect
>>>Arjuna Technologies Ltd
>>>www.arjuna.com
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>  
>>
>