RE: [ws-caf] RE: [members] Public Review of WS-Context v1.0 specification

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

Jamie,
Can you please setup the ballot.

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:03 PM
>To: 'James Bryce Clark'
>Cc: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [ws-caf] RE: [members] Public Review of WS-Context 
>v1.0 specification
>
>
>Jamie,
>
>At our meeting yesterday[a], the TC decided to  establish a 
>ballot to progress WS-Context v 1.0 to Committee 
>Specification. Could you please set up the ballot as per the 
>TC process.
>
>Cheers,
>  Martin.
>
>[a] 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-caf/email/archi
ves/20051
>2/msg00006.html
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org]
>>Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:06 AM
>>To: members@lists.oasis-open.org; tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: [members] Public Review of WS-Context v1.0 specification
>>
>>
>>
>>To:  OASIS members, public announce lists
>>
>>The OASIS Web Services Composite Application Framework TC has
>>approved the 
>>following specification and related documents as a Committee 
>Draft and 
>>approved the package for public review:
>>
>>      WS-Context v1.0 revision dated 22 November 2005
>>
>>The public review starts today, 30 November 2005, and ends 15 November
>>2005.  This is a third review of the specification as provided 
>>by OASIS TC 
>>Process rules [1] .  Announcement of the first review can be 
>>found at [2], 
>>and the second was announced at [3].  Under our rules, 
>>subsequent reviews 
>>must be held for a minimum of 15 days.  Changes made to a 
>>specification 
>>after a review must be clearly identified in any subsequent 
>>review [4], and 
>>this subsequent review is limited in scope to those changes 
>>made in the 
>>previous review round.
>>
>>Public review from potential users, developers and stakeholders is an
>>important part of the OASIS process to assure interoperability and 
>>quality.  Comments are solicited from all interested parties. 
>>Comments may 
>>be submitted to the TC by any person via a web form found on 
>>the TC's web 
>>page at [5]. Click the button for "Send A Comment" at the top 
>>of the page. 
>>Direct access to the comment form is available at [6].  
>>Submitted comments 
>>(for this work as well as other works of that TC) are publicly 
>>archived and 
>>can be viewed at [7].
>>
>>The specification and related documents are available here:
>>
>>Zip file with entire package:
>>http://www.oasis->open.org/committees/download.php/15518/WS-Co
ntext.zip
>
>1.  Specification:
>         a. HTML:  In Zip file:  WSCTX.htm
>         b.  PDF:   In Zip file:  WSCTX.pdf
>         c.  Marked version showing changes:  Changes.txt
>
>2.  Main Schema:   In Zip file:  wsctx.xsd
>
>3.  WSDL:  In ZIp file:  wsctx.wsdl
>
>4.  Errata:  In Zip file:  ws-context-1.0-errata.pdf
>         (empty:  no errata yet)
>
>~   James Bryce Clark
>~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>~   jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
>
>[1] Public review rules:
>http://www.oasis->open.org/committees/process.php#3.2
>[2] First review: 
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200411/msg00003.html
>[3] Second review: 
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200507/msg00005.html
>[4] Change log:  the requirement is addressed by the document 
>"Changes.txt" 
>in the Zip file noted above.
>[5] TC public home page:  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ws-caf
>[6] Comment form: 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=ws-caf
>[7] Comments list archive: 
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-caf->comment/
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>This email list is used solely by OASIS for official
>consortium communications. Opt-out requests may be sent to 
>member_services@oasis-open.org, however, all members are 
>strongly encouraged to maintain a subscription to this list.
>
>