[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (WSCALENDAR-363) Line 887 - Therelationship of tables 3-7 and 3-8 is not clear.

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/WSCALENDAR-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=25539#action_25539 ] 

Toby Considine commented on WSCALENDAR-363:
-------------------------------------------

Amazing the things that stick. RRULE had some errors in it in the last published schemas. Because of that, [I] was unable to use RRULE to make a vavailability object. Quite different from RRULE not used.

> Line 887 - The relationship of tables 3-7 and 3-8 is not clear.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSCALENDAR-363
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/WSCALENDAR-363
>             Project: OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spec
>    Affects Versions: pr02
>         Environment: William Cox
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: Toby Considine
>
> They are largely the same, and seem in part a quotation of another specification. I was told verbally that RRule is not used. Is Granularity? is it the same as the granularity in the definition at line 718? Different? Why? If you're extending a standard definition for vavailability then you could indicate the base elements with an asterisk or other convention. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira