[OASIS Issue Tracker] (WSCALENDAR-510) SOA-RM Normative?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated WSCALENDAR-510:
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: 
The PIM does not rely on SOA-RM, and has an informative reference to connect the purpose of WS-Calendar to the purpose of the PIM.

Note that this is carryover text from WS-Calendar, included so that the context of WS-Calendar. However, WS-Calendar as a PSM likely has a different focus than the PIM (although the PIM purpose fits well with the stated WS-Calendar purpose on lines 76-77).

Improve the wording, as the goal of the PIM is broader than that of WS-Calendar. 

> SOA-RM Normative?
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: WSCALENDAR-510
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-510
>             Project: OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: PIM
>    Affects Versions: PIM CSPRD02
>         Environment: TAB Comments
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: William Cox
>             Fix For: PIM WD11
>
>
> 1.7 Architectural References and Background reads in part: ***** WS-Calendar and this WS-Calendar PIM assume incorporation into services. Accordingly it assumes a certain background of definitions and discussion of roles, names, and interaction patterns. This document relies heavily on roles and interactions as defined in the OASIS Standard Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture [SOA-RM]. ***** Does "relies heavily on roles and interactions" [lines 76-77] mean that this proposal normatively relies on SOA-RM? If so, SOA-RM needs to be under normative references and where appropriate, cited by section numbers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)