[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (WSCALENDAR-524) Unclear, out-of-scope statement in Conformance section
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] William Cox updated WSCALENDAR-524: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: PIM WD12 > Unclear, out-of-scope statement in Conformance section > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WSCALENDAR-524 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-524 > Project: OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: PIM > Affects Versions: PIM CSPRD02 > Environment: TAB Comments > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: William Cox > Priority: Minor > Fix For: PIM WD11, PIM WD12 > > > Unclear, out-of-scope statement in Conformance section 9 [Line 621] > The sentence "If the implementer and/or implementation claiming conformance is using WS-Calendar PIM as part of a larger business or service communication, they SHALL follow not only the semantic rules herein, but SHALL also conform to the rules for specifying inheritance in referencing standards." > Such concerns on how implementations should claim conformance to something larger than this specification, seems out of place/scope. Why the worry? > A bit confusing, because that seems to open the door to the referencing standard/profile altering the conditions for conformance to THIS (WS-cal PIM) specification -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]