[OASIS Issue Tracker] (WSCALENDAR-552) Odd construction of RelationLink.link and LinkType.reference

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated WSCALENDAR-552:
-----------------------------------

        Fix Version/s: PIM WD15
    Affects Version/s: PIM CS01
             Proposal: 
Modify cardinality of RelationLinkType:link to be [0..1].

Consider modifying LinkType:reference cardinality to [1].
           Resolution: Modify cardinality of RelationLinkType:link to be [0..1].
          Component/s: PIM

Defer consideration of modifying LinkType:reference cardinality to [1]. 

> Odd construction of RelationLink.link and LinkType.reference
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSCALENDAR-552
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-552
>             Project: OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: PIM
>    Affects Versions: PIM CS01
>         Environment: Steve Ray
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-calendar-comment/201502/msg00001.html
>            Reporter: William Cox
>            Assignee: William Cox
>             Fix For: PIM WD15
>
>
> from second part of email:
> RelationLink.link is shown as mandatory, with LinkType.reference as optional. This seems an odd construction. If you believe that every instance of RelationLink must link to something, then LinkType.reference should be mandatory. If you think it may sometimes not link to something, then RelationLink.link should be optional.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)