[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Next steps
In last Friday’s sparsely attended meeting, Gershon and I discussed the coming roadmap. There are several initiatives that are not yet announced that could rely on our work, especially the MIN which is intended for high-speed machine negotiations
of human-centric schedules. We would like to have these out for Public Review before year-end. Our plan is to discuss this specification next week, and vote it out the week after. So this is a call to action: -
I need the detailed UML-based criticisms that have been promised. -
I need a RFC5545-based critique of potential incompatibilities introduced -
I need a merciless request to eliminate the baggage in the spec that is almost invisible to me after all the writing If I get these, there will be one more draft before next week. Otherwise, we will discuss the last draft. tc |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]