Re: Request for Special Majority Vote

Hi Toby and all,

The form to request a Special Majority vote for a Committee Specification is at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tc-admin-requests/committee-specification-ballot-request

A separate form should be submitted for each Committee Specification.

For the comment resolution logs, you should send an email to "ws-calendar-comment@lists.oasis-open.org" stating that no comments were received, for Ws-Calendar MIN csprd02 or for Streams csprd03 (a separate email for each specification).

You may use the URI of this email (as found in the email archive at https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-calendar-comment/) as the link to the Comment Resolution log, which is requested in the Special Majority vote form.

The form includes a sectin to request Designated Cross Reference changes.

Best regards,

Paul

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Considine, Toby <Toby.Considine@unc.edu> wrote:

In an error, we voted in TC for to advance the WS-Calendar MIN and Streams specifications that recently completed public review as Committee Specifications.

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/58829/Minutes_WS-Calendar-TC_20160826_Draft.txt

When reviewing the submission forms this morning, I realized there was no submission form as the process requires that I request a  a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification. THe minutes above record the TC's resolution, including the location of the editable versions of the files and any other ballot details.

The minutes further authorize that I provide you with any assistance you require to make sure that the XML artifact (part of STRMS) be edited to include the appropriate OASIS header and copyright information.

No further comments were received during the public review for either specification.

One modification is requested to the Streams specification, to reflect that the normative reference to vAvailability be updated. During August, the IETF assigned an RFC Number to this specification. Accordingly, I request that as part of publication the normative reference

[vAvailability]       C. Daboo, M. Douglas: Calendar Availability, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calext-availability-01 Internet Draft, November 2015.

be replaced with the updated reference:

[vAvailability]        C. Daboo, M. Douglas: Calendar Availability, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7953, Proposed Standard, August 2016.

Thank you for your prompt assistance.

tc

Paul Knight - Tel: +1 781-883-1783
OASIS - Advancing open standards for the information society - Document Process Analyst
Identity Ecosystem Steering Group - Framework Management Office

ws-calendar message