This issue is assigned the number 074. For further
discussions on this issue, please refer to this issue number or use this
thread.
From: Scott de Deugd
[mailto:dedeugd@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 4:46 PM
To: ws-dd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-dd] New Issue: Purpose behind dup requirements?
Please defer discussions on this issue until a time this issue is accepted and
is assigned a number.
Description:
Document: DPWS Version 1.0
Line number: Line 245
Owner: Scott de Deugd
Description:
Editorial:
Section 3.6
says:
R0036: A
SERVICE MAY reject a MIME SOAP ENVELOPE if the Content-Transfer-Encoding header
field mechanism of any MIME part is not "binary".
R0037: A
SERVICE MUST NOT send a MIME SOAP ENVELOPE unless the Content-Transfer-Encoding
header field mechanism of every MIME part is "binary"
There are
several requirements like this. Is the purpose behind this to allow a
service to have more flexibility than the client, which might be constrained?
If so we
should probably say this up front so people don't view this as an
inconsistency.
Proposed Resolution (changes in red):
Clarify