OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-dd message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-dd] Results of poll on face-to-face meeting attendance andpreferences


Alain Regnier schrieb:
>  
> In addition to the numbers below, Elmar said he could also attend in 
> person in Redmond or Irvine.
> (the 3 ballots regarding the location of the meeting do not include a 
> response from him)
I want to confirm this. Redmond is fine for me. I never was there before :-)

And I want to stress that we should make a decision soon. Of course, I'm 
one of the guys who forgot to vote but i have to arrange the meeting or 
the flights soon.

Regards,
Elmar
>  
> Alain
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Toby Nixon [mailto:Toby.Nixon@microsoft.com]
> *Sent:* Mon 6/8/2009 11:57 AM
> *To:* ws-dd@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* [ws-dd] Results of poll on face-to-face meeting attendance 
> and preferences
>
> The ballots regarding the proposed face-to-face meeting in July 
> concluded last Friday evening.
>
>  
>
> We currently have 14 voting TC members, so we need 8 attendees to have 
> a quorum to conduct business at a meeting.
>
>  
>
> Of the 14 voting members, 9 voted on the ballots, plus 2 members who 
> are not currently voting members, for a total of 11 votes.
>
>  
>
> The results of the ballots were as follows:
>
>  
>
> For each location, would you attend in person, participate by 
> teleconference, or not participate:
>
>  
>
> *Rostock*: Attend in person 2, participate by teleconference 2, not 
> participate 7
>
> *Irvine*: Attend in person 3, participate by teleconference 5, not 
> participate 3
>
> *Redmond*: Attend in person 6, participate by teleconference 4, not 
> participate 1
>
>  
>
> On the fourth ballot, regarding preference between the locations, the 
> voting was Rostock 3, Irvine 3, Redmond 4.
>
>  
>
> From this, I conclude that we would not achieve quorum in Rostock. We 
> would not have a quorum present in person in either Irvine or Redmond, 
> but when including participation by teleconference, we would have 
> quorum in Irvine (8) or Redmond (10). The location preference is 
> Redmond (by one vote).
>
>  
>
> *The proposal is thus to have the face-to-face meeting in Redmond, 
> July 14-16. *
>
>  
>
> Any thoughts or discussion on this? Should we go ahead with this plan, 
> so that those who plan to attend in person can make travel 
> arrangements and the hosts can make logistical arrangements? Will we 
> have critical mass at the meeting to make some decisions and move the 
> work forward?
>
>  
>
>             -- Toby
>
>  
>
> Toby Nixon  |  Senior Standards Program Manager  |  Windows Device and 
> Storage Technologies  |  Microsoft Corporation
>
> toby.nixon@microsoft.com <mailto:toby.nixon@microsoft.com>  |  
> www.microsoft.com <http://www.microsoft.com/> | V: +1 425 706 2792  |  
> M: +1 206 790 6377  |  F: +1 425 708 4811
>
>  
>


-- 
*******************************************************************************
  Dipl.-Inf. Elmar Zeeb
  Universität Rostock, Fakultät f. Informatik und Elektrotechnik
  Institut f. Angewandte Mikroelektronik und Datentechnik
  University of Rostock, Faculty of CS and EE
  Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering,
  18051 Rostock
  Deutschland/Germany
  Tel. : ++49 (0)381 498 - 7262
  Fax  : ++49 (0)381 498 - 7252
  Email: elmar.zeeb@uni-rostock.de
  www  : http://www.imd.uni-rostock.de/, http://www.ws4d.org/
*******************************************************************************



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]