[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: To WS-RA reviewers
I suggest that we review the specification to spot substantive issues,
if any, by Oct 13th. Thanks. From: Toby Nixon
[mailto:Toby.Nixon@microsoft.com] Thanks
for forwarding, Alain. So,
here we have our work laid out for the next couple of weeks – we need to review
WS-Eventing, WS-MetadataExchange, and WS-Transfer, and submit comments to
WS-RA. I will confirm with Bob that it will be OK for us to submit comments
after our October 13 teleconference. Do
you all have any preference for how we organize this review? I think the
obvious thing is for comments related to how the WS-RA specs would be used in
DPWS implementations to be sent to the WS-DD list ASAP. We can discuss them,
and those that have consensus agreement can be sent by the chairs to WS-RA as
being consensus WS-DD comments. Of course, individuals can send their own
comments directly to WS-RA as well. Would we like to tackle the specs in any
particular order, or just discuss the comments as they arrive on our October 6
and 13 teleconferences, and send whatever we have consensus on after the
October 13 call? Thoughts?
-- Toby Toby Nixon | Senior Standards Program Manager
| Windows Devices and Networking Technologies | Microsoft
Corporation toby.nixon@microsoft.com
| www.microsoft.com | V: +1 425
706 2792 | M: +1 206 790 6377 | F: +1 425 708 4811 From: Alain Regnier
[mailto:alain@ricoh-tech.com] FYI. The drafts we've talked about from the WS-RA working
group. Alain From: Bob Freund
[mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com] Dear WS-RA Reviewers, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]