RE: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes

["Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>]

W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when an element name
is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things like
"Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not to things like
"Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage". Any reason for this?

Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered to
be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I wonder
if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these things out?

- g

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM
> To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
> 
> Editors,
> 
> I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of 
> stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This 
> was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards 
> the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix 
> it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will 
> know what I'm talking about ;-)
> 
> 1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors 
> that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes 
> (with change tracking turned on).
> 2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues, 
> which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send 
> them in a subsequent email.
> 3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send 
> those to the TC list.
> 
> Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that 
> I've made.
> 
> Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get 
> a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes 
> include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font 
> changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed. 
> oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the 
> 'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com 
> to 'example.com' etc.
> 
> I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted 
> us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by 
> the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc 
> to the TC site and get approval from the TC.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
>