[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
Gilbert Pilz wrote: > W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when an element name > is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things like > "Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not to things like > "Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage". Any reason for this? > Good catch. I did a search-and-replace for the top-level elements. I'll make those changes and send another version around. Will do so sometime today in the afternoon -- have some calls to attend :-( Marc: sorry about the .sxw document. I'll send a PDF version in my next email. > Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered to > be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I wonder > if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these things out? > The document contains only changes from the 1st category. I did not want to mix the two. As I said in my previous email, I'll send the changes in the 2nd category in a separate email. "Note" sounds like a good idea, I'll make sure that it converts correctly to PDF. > - g > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] >>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM >>To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes >> >>Editors, >> >>I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of >>stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This >>was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards >>the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix >>it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will >>know what I'm talking about ;-) >> >>1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors >>that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes >>(with change tracking turned on). >>2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues, >>which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send >>them in a subsequent email. >>3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send >>those to the TC list. >> >>Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that >>I've made. >> >>Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get >>a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes >>include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font >>changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed. >>oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the >>'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com >>to 'example.com' etc. >> >>I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted >>us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by >>the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc >>to the TC site and get approval from the TC. >> >>Comments? >> >>-Anish >>-- >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]