ws-rx-editors message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:19:14 -0400
Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.
It looks good - thanks for the effort!
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
08/16/2005 04:26 PM
|
To
| Gilbert Pilz <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>
|
cc
| ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version
of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes |
|
Attached are the .sxw and .pdf versions with fixes
for 'wsrm:' as
pointed out by Gil.
-Anish
--
PS: we really need a CVS soon (instead of passing of files in emails).
Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when
an element name
> is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things
like
> "Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not
to things like
> "Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage".
Any reason for this?
>
> Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered
to
> be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I
wonder
> if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these
things out?
>
> - g
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
>>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM
>>To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed
fixes
>>
>>Editors,
>>
>>I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of
>>stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This
>>was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards
>>the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix
>>it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will
>>know what I'm talking about ;-)
>>
>>1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors
>>that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes
>>(with change tracking turned on).
>>2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues,
>>which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send
>>them in a subsequent email.
>>3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send
>>those to the TC list.
>>
>>Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that
>>I've made.
>>
>>Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get
>>a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes
>>include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font
>>changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed.
>>oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the
>>'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com
>>to 'example.com' etc.
>>
>>I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted
>>us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by
>>the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc
>>to the TC site and get approval from the TC.
>>
>>Comments?
>>
>>-Anish
>>--
>>
>>
>
>
[attachment "WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-01.sxw" deleted
by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-01.pdf"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]