OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes


Doug: Thanks for reviewing it.

Any other comments?
If you do have them please send them by the end of this week, after 
which I'll assume that the changes are acceptable and forward it to the TC.

Thx!

-Anish
--

Doug Davis wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.  It looks good - thanks for the 
> effort!
> -Doug
> 
> 
> 
> *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>*
> 
> 08/16/2005 04:26 PM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	Gilbert Pilz <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>
> cc
> 	ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject
> 	Re: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Attached are the .sxw and .pdf versions with fixes for 'wsrm:' as
> pointed out by Gil.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> PS: we really need a CVS soon (instead of passing of files in emails).
> 
> Gilbert Pilz wrote:
>  > W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when an element name
>  > is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things like
>  > "Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not to things like
>  > "Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage". Any reason for this?
>  >
>  > Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered to
>  > be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I wonder
>  > if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these things out?
>  >
>  > - g
>  >
>  >
>  >>-----Original Message-----
>  >>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
>  >>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM
>  >>To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>  >>Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
>  >>
>  >>Editors,
>  >>
>  >>I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of
>  >>stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This
>  >>was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards
>  >>the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix
>  >>it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will
>  >>know what I'm talking about ;-)
>  >>
>  >>1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors
>  >>that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes
>  >>(with change tracking turned on).
>  >>2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues,
>  >>which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send
>  >>them in a subsequent email.
>  >>3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send
>  >>those to the TC list.
>  >>
>  >>Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that
>  >>I've made.
>  >>
>  >>Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get
>  >>a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes
>  >>include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font
>  >>changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed.
>  >>oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the
>  >>'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com
>  >>to 'example.com' etc.
>  >>
>  >>I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted
>  >>us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by
>  >>the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc
>  >>to the TC site and get approval from the TC.
>  >>
>  >>Comments?
>  >>
>  >>-Anish
>  >>--
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
> [attachment "WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-01.sxw" deleted by Doug 
> Davis/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "WS-ReliableMessaging-v1[1].0-wd-01.pdf" 
> deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]