Re: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number?

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Sanjay,

OO Notes which are equivalent of MS Word comments can be viewed only 
three different ways:
1) look at the PDF, (2) move your cursor over the tiny yellow rectangle 
(where the comment appears) in .sxw file, (3) print the doc and specify 
in the options that you want the Notes.

The MS Word comment option where you can do a view->comments is not 
available (AFAIK) in OO.

-Anish
--


Patil, Sanjay wrote:
>  
> Not necessarily on each line, but a note with the issue # for an added 
> paragraph, etc, would be enough. For example, the paragraph on lines 391 
> to 397 describes the new subelement  
> /wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement/wsrm:Final. It will very useful for a 
> reviewer to see the annotation for this paragraph to say - i019 and i028.
>  
> I guess the technique you describe below might work but I am not an 
> expert on OO as you can tell :-) Preferably, it should not be required 
> to hover the mouse on the text to see the notes and something akin to MS 
> Word comments is desirable.
>  
> Thanks,
> Sanjay
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
>     *Sent:* Monday, Sep 19, 2005 12:45 PM
>     *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>     *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number?
> 
> 
>     Oh, you mean on each specific line that changed?  I thought you
>     meant in the 'revision history' section.
>     Don't know if there's an easy way to mark each line with the issue #
>     w/o a lot of manual typing.
>     Only thing I could think of would be to temporarily change your user
>     name to include the issue #, then the change record would include it
>     as part of the change  ;-)
>     Kind of a hack though.
>     -Doug
> 
> 
> 
>     *"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>*
> 
>     09/19/2005 03:38 PM
> 
>     	
>     To
>     	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
>     cc
>     	
>     Subject
>     	RE: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number?
> 
> 
>     	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      
>     Ah! Then I must have missed the annotations/notes.  Could some one
>     please educate me about how to read the notes in the OO doc.
>      
>     Thanks,
>     Sanjay
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] *
>     Sent:* Monday, Sep 19, 2005 12:33 PM*
>     To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org*
>     Subject:* Re: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number?
> 
> 
>     I did that on my changes, and I see Umit did that on hers so I think
>     we're ok.
>     -Doug
> 
> 
>     *"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>*
> 
>     09/19/2005 03:06 PM
> 
>     	
>     To
>     	<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
>     cc
>     	
>     Subject
>     	[ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number?
> 
> 
> 
>     	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     Would it make sense to add annotation with the issue number whenever
>     there are any changes made to the spec text. I think it will make it
>     easier for the TC members to understand where each change is originating
>     from. If a particular change is purely editorial, we could say that in
>     the annotation.
> 
>     In my experience with other TCs, such annotations are quite useful
>     especially when the drafts include changes for many issues.
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Sanjay
>